We’ve had an intensification of foreign coverage particularly in the Arab and Islamic world. I think that those events in some ways reminded people that, that the world is a dangerous place that that there was a lot that they didn’t know about it and that mews had, it had value that may have felt they could gloss over during a period in the 1990s when the world seemed to be as more stable and less dynamic place. Speaking parochially and then I’ll let Raju go, it’s also been very expensive newspapers to cover the events that have followed 9/11 whether it was in foreign news per say, whether it was in trying to understand better the enormous amounts of money that have been spent since 9/11. It’s been an expensive proposition and some of the belt tightening we’ve seen lately is in someway to compensate for the enormous amounts of money that was spent then. But I’ll say finally it has, as I think the post has shown in the series that produced, this was published in the last several months the Dana Priest and Will Arkin did called Top Secret America. It has again provided an opportunity for journalist to do that kind of basic accountability of how the government I spending its money and well or poorly and the secrets it’s trying to keep Dana and Will in the did an extraordinary job in getting to the bottom of an enterprise that has strong in the United States but under our noses here in Washington to levels that are almost unimaginable in terms of employees, money spent and where all this existed under the umbrella of classification.

Raju: I think it’s obviously its early but it remains to be seen whether 9/11 will define or will be the seminal event of the century or it will be rise of India and China or it will be something else I think its kind of a little early to kind of figure that out but obviously in the last 10 years 9/11 has been the kind of the all consuming or its fall out has been the all consuming event for the entire world not just the US. And it has you know has found the whole bunch of different strands some people could argue that our subsequent investments in the wars have been you know caused, our deficits to go up and caused our economic problems. So they could a range of kind of fall out issues that I think the media has had to deal with.

Just on the Islam front as Doug said I think its time to think one of these sharply increase the awareness of Islam both in a good and a bad way, in a good way in a sense that there more people willing to kind of at least try to understand what it means. If you equate 9/11 with Islam which is not necessary a valid equation anyway but it has also caused a lot of people to kind of become you know more sceptical or more conspiratorial about these issues. You drive up the New Jersey turnpike you see now a huge bill board that kind of says why Islam and its like a group trying to kind of explain what Islam stands for. The fact that they need to do it now, is both at a good and a bad time because there is a willingness to understand what it is, but there is also need for it unfortunately because there is a lot of myths and a lot of falsies about it. So I think its, the story still remains to be told even you know nine years later.